Its hazard is principally associated with the ionising radiation it emits. However, it is primarily hazardous if inhaled in small particles. Many industries produce hazardous and toxic waste. All toxic waste needs to be dealt with safely, not just radioactive waste. The radioactivity of nuclear waste naturally decays, and has a finite radiotoxic lifetime.
Within a period of 1,, years, the radioactivity of HLW decays to that of the originally mined ore. Its hazard then depends on how concentrated it is.
By comparison, other industrial wastes e. Most nuclear waste produced is hazardous, due to its radioactivity, for only a few tens of years and is routinely disposed of in near-surface disposal facilities see above. International conventions define what is hazardous in terms of radiation dose, and national regulations limit allowable doses accordingly. Well-developed industry technology ensures that these regulations are met so that any hazardous waste is handled in a way it poses no risk to human health or the environment.
Waste is converted into a stable form that is suitable for disposal. In the case of HLW, a multi-barrier approach, combining containment and geological disposal, ensures isolation of the waste from people and the environment for thousands of years.
Radioactive Waste Management. Radiation scientists, geologists and engineers have produced detailed plans for safe underground storage of nuclear waste, and some are now operating. Geological repositories for HLW are designed to ensure that harmful radiation would not reach the surface even in the event of severe earthquakes or through the passage of time. The designs for long-term disposal incorporate multiple layers of protection.
Waste is encapsulated in highly engineered casks in stable, vitrified form, and is emplaced at depths well below the biosphere.
Such long-term geological storage solutions are designed to prevent any movement of radioactivity for thousands of years. Whilst the timeframes in question preclude full testing, nature has provided analogous examples of the successful storage of radioactive waste in stable geological formations. About two billion years ago, in what is now Gabon in Africa, a rich natural uranium deposit produced spontaneous, large nuclear reactions which ran for many years.
Since then, despite thousands of centuries of tropical rain and subsurface water, the long-lived radioactive 'waste' from those 'reactors' has migrated less than 10 metres. Storage and Disposal of Radioactive Waste. Because it is widely accepted that producers of radioactive waste should bear the costs of disposal, most countries with nuclear power programmes make estimates of the costs of disposal and update these periodically.
For LLW the costs are well-known because numerous facilities have been built and have operated for many years around the world. For HLW, cost estimates are becoming increasingly reliable as projects get closer to implementation. Based on the estimated total costs of managing nuclear waste, many countries require that the operators of nuclear power plants set aside funding to cover all costs. Different mechanisms exist in different countries. Although the sum already deposited in dedicated funds is high, the costs of waste management do not drastically increase the price of electricity.
Thus, although the absolute costs of waste management are high, they do not render the nuclear fuel cycle uneconomic, because of the high ratio of revenue earned to waste volumes produced. Radioactive Waste National Policies and Funding. The option of disposal of waste into space has been examined repeatedly since the s.
This option has not been implemented and further studies have not been performed because of the high cost and the safety aspects associated with the risk of launch failure. International Nuclear Waste Disposal Concepts. Transmutation is the process of transforming one radionuclide into another via neutron bombardment in a nuclear reactor or accelerator-driven device.
The objective is to change long-lived actinides and fission products into significantly shorter-lived nuclides. The goal is to have waste that becomes radiologically harmless in only a few hundred years. Transmutation is not feasible for all of the waste produced in the past or to be produced.
Transmutation may be able to reduce waste quantities, but it will do so only to a certain extent and therefore not eliminate the need for some means of ultimate disposal.
Research on transmutation is, however, ongoing. One of the technical issues is to isolate each nuclide partition so that it can then be irradiated, otherwise the process is likely to create as much waste as it destroys.
Cost aside, it is likely that the benefits of transmutation will not compensate the burden of additional required operations for separating and transmuting only part of the nuclides.
HLW is kept in secure nuclear facilities with appropriate protection measures. The search will continue until Everywhere is a possible location, provided the geological rock formation for an underground repository is favourable. The expert commission presented its final report in July , sticking to these general parameters. The search procedure will focus on possible storage sites in rock salt, clay rock and crystalline granite.
It will thus also include the salt mine at Gorleben where explorations had already begun but were terminated amid large protests from citizens see below. The nuclear waste is to be stored for one million years in the final repository, but shall be retrievable for the first years, the commission suggests. This is in case a treatment is found to reduce radioactivity earlier transmutation. The commission, made up from parliamentarians, scientists and NGOs agreed on a general export-ban for nuclear waste.
The commission's much fought over work showed that finding the right site is a difficult one as no community or town in Germany is particularly keen on living next to a cemetery for contaminated waste, Hendricks said. And the residents of Salzgitter, near Schacht Konrad, are afraid that the nearby repository will be extended to house even more than the , m3 of low and medium-level waste. The state of Lower Saxony only agreed to the site selection law if investigations at Gorleben salt mine were stopped and no further atomic waste containers were sent to the interim storage facility nearby.
Security concerns at existing facilities for waste with negligible heat generation at Morsleben and in the old salt mine Asse , which will cost several billion euros to be fixed, have undermined the trust in the safety of nuclear waste repositories. The situation is particularly dire at Asse, where over , m3 of low and medium-level waste have to be retrieved from instable mine shafts partially flooded with groundwater influent saline solutions , causing concerns that radioactive elements could contaminate the drinking water nearby.
Getting the leaking radioactive barrels, which were deposited in , out of Asse cannot be attempted until , the ministry said. It is not clear where the Asse waste will then be stored. Minister Hendricks suggests in the new waste disposal programme that the final repository for high-level waste should also be able to accommodate the , m3 from Asse.
Critics claim this will make finding a final repository even more difficult because storing heat-generating waste and low and medium-level waste together requires different conditions and, above all, much more space. The main body in charge of conducting the search is the Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal BGE which prepares the reports and conducts the stakeholder participation events.
This report was presented on 28 September At this time, the CNSC has not yet received any applications for site preparation and construction of a deep geological repository that will provide long-term management of radioactive waste.
Figure 1 lists the organizations responsible for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel, low-level radioactive waste, intermediate-level radioactive waste, and uranium mine and mill tailings in Canada. In Canada, used nuclear fuel is stored in wet and dry states. When the fuel first exits a power reactor, it is placed in water-filled bays.
Water cools the nuclear fuel and shields the radiation. After several years in the bays — 6 to 10 years, depending on site-specific needs and organizational administrative controls — and when the associated heat generation has diminished, the fuel can be transferred to a dry storage facility.
These dry storage facilities employ large, reinforced concrete canisters or containers. Each nuclear power plant site in Canada has enough space to store all the used nuclear fuel produced during the operating life of the station. A megawatt CANDU nuclear reactor, for example, produces approximately 90 tonnes of heavy metal used nuclear fuel annually. In Canada, all used nuclear fuel is stored at the site where it was produced, with the following exceptions:.
The owners of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste are licensed by the CNSC to manage and operate interim storage facilities for their radioactive wastes. Canada also has volumes of LLW from past practices referred to as historic waste that was once managed in a manner no longer considered acceptable, but for which the current owner cannot be reasonably held responsible. The Government of Canada has accepted responsibility for the long-term management of these wastes.
These wastes and contaminated soils amount to roughly 1. In March , the Government of Canada and the local municipalities agreed on community-developed proposals as potential solutions for the cleanup and long-term management of historic LLW in the Port Hope area, and launched the Port Hope Area Initiative.
These initiatives are the responsibility of AECL, and the work is delivered by CNL, based on a government-owned contractor-operated model.
Activities continue to be carried out to quantify the extent of historic LLW liabilities across Canada non-Port Hope sites and develop plans for their discharge. Legacy wastes in the Canadian context specifically date back to the Cold War and birth of nuclear technologies in Canada; these wastes are located at AECL sites.
Besides these radioactive wastes, the AECL site includes other wastes resulting from the decommissioning of buildings and infrastructure, and from environmental remediation.
Uranium mining and milling wastes comprise 3 major waste streams: mill tailings, waste rock and waste water. The method used to manage tailings from uranium mine operations varies from mine to mine. Tailings management facilities have evolved over the decades, from the simple deposition of tailings into natural landforms, lakes or abandoned underground mines, to the construction of engineered surface storage facilities, to the current practice of placing the tailings in engineered mined-out open pits converted to tailings management facilities.
Tailings in modern facilities are covered with water subaqueous deposition during operations to enhance radiation protection and to avoid the oxidation and winter freezing of the tailings. In the northern Saskatchewan open-pit sites located within the Athabasca Basin, most of the waste rock is sandstone, which is environmentally benign and suitable for surface disposal.
Some of the waste rock special waste rock , however, contains either low-grade, uneconomic ore or significant concentrations of secondary minerals. The current method for managing special waste rock is to either blend it with high-grade ore for processing or isolate it from atmospheric conditions e.
0コメント